The human race showing signs of splitting into two species

The human race may one day split into two separate species, an attractive, intelligent ruling, rich group and an underclass of dim-witted, fat, ugly goblin-like creatures, according to a top scientist. The political party each belongs to will also fall into two categories: Conservative/Independent and Liberal/Socialist.

In a few thousand years up to 100,000 years into the future, sexual selection could mean that two distinct breeds of human will have developed. It’s signs are already here.

The alarming prediction comes from evolutionary theorist Oliver Curry from the London School of Economics, who says that the human race will have reached its physical peak by the year 3000.

humans The report claims that after they reach their peak around the year 3000 humans will begin to regress

Enlarge the image

These humans will be between 6ft and 7ft tall and they will live up to 120 years.

“Physical features will be driven by indicators of health, youth and fertility that men and women have evolved to look for in potential mates,” says the report, which suggests that advances in cosmetic surgery and other body modifying techniques will effectively homogenise our appearance.

Men will have symmetrical facial features, deeper voices and bigger penises, according to Curry in a report commissioned for men’s satellite TV channel Bravo.

Women will all have glossy hair, smooth hairless skin, large eyes and pert breasts, according to Curry.

Racial differences will be a thing of the past as interbreeding produces a single coffee-colored skin tone. The fat, dumb welfare state people, those most likely to be Democrats in America, Labour Party in England and Socialists in the rest of Europe are becoming evident.

The future for our descendants isn’t all long life, perfect bodies and chiselled features, however.

While humans will reach their peak in 1000 years’ time, 10,000 years later our reliance on technology will have begun to dramatically change our appearance.

Medicine will weaken our immune system and we will begin to appear more child-like.

Dr. Curry said: “The report suggests that the future of man will be a story of the good, the bad and the ugly.

Today you can see the split. Cindy Sheehan, Hugo Chavez, Barbra Boxer, and Henry Waxman are among the Liberal/Socialist party of trolls. While Bush, McCain, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bill O’Rielly and Sean Hannity are the Conservative/Independent party members.

It’s just a theory, of course.

–NIALL FIRTH interviewed Dr. Curry.

Advertisements

Read all about it: Journalists urge their readers to drop subscriptions and advertisers to boycott the paper they work for

Mick Gregory

Imagine at your office, if the managers were encouraging customers to stop using your company, and they posed for pictures, putting up a banner over a highway that stated “Quit buying from my (X) company!”

Ms. Wendy McCaw is the publisher of Santa Barbara News-Press (which she over-paid the New York Times for four years ago). If you have been following this saga in the mainstream media, i.e. the LA Times, SF Chronicle or NY Times, you would think she is somehow trying to destroy her own property in just trying to manage it. But of course that is just one side of the story pushed out by the “objective journalists” who believe that the newspaper is some kind of government/taxpayer supported public service that they can use to smear the middle class and the Hollywood personalities who live in the area.

Below is the full version of Ms. McCaw’s commentary. You will get a good look at what journalists really do behind the scenes at your daily newspapers.

Earlier, the Times published in its print edition another commentary by Mr. Cannon attacking the News-Press. The Times refused to publish Mrs. McCaw’s response to Mr. Cannon’s accusations in its print edition. Times editors finally put it on the Times Web site, but only after the News-Press published the commentary along with a note about that newspaper’s initial refusal.

Dear Mr. Cannon,
The world has passed you by. Young people today no longer wear watches, no longer read newspapers, no longer watch TV news. They communicate by text messaging and in MY SPACE. They distrust the mainstream media, in large part because they distrust the decrepit ideas asserted by the old generation who claim to be “experts” such as yourself. You exemplify the basis for this distrust with your reference to “various inquiries” allegedly finding that we committed some journalistic sin.

This is the essence of irresponsible journalism and at the core of your deserved loss of reputation. Instead of relying on purposely uninformed bloggers and the biased “journalists” they support who are attempting to insert the Teamsters Union into Santa Barbara’s mainstream newspaper for supposed facts, why not roll up your sleeves and do some real investigative work? I challenge you to state a single legitimate agency “inquiry” that has found we violated a journalistic standard. None exists. It is simply more evidence why certain journalists today have committed a grave disservice to the public they claim to serve.

For decades, reporters who had no ownership interest in the product they produced were allowed to say whatever they wanted. They ran the newspapers even though they didn’t own the newspapers, with no heed paid to the bottom line. While these journalists claimed as “theirs” the newspapers by which they merely were employed, they acted in total disregard for whether the paper was profitable enough to ensure it would survive into the next year, much less the onslaught of the cataclysm of the Internet. The end result is that countless newspapers today face massive declines in circulation if not outright collapse. The L.A. Times is laying off hundreds as is the San Francisco Chronicle. Circulation is down all over the country. The time has come for the owners of these papers to step in and see to it that they are run in a proper business fashion.

The journalists, such as you, Mr. Cannon, who had nothing at stake but still exercised dominion and control for so many years over business entities they never owned, turned out to be the worst of stewards of the public’s need for a long-term journalistic presence.
Continue reading

Don Imus — The Talk Jock Who Supports Democrats Gets Whacked by Sharpton. But who placed the call?

Mick Gregory

UPDATE:

Imus has campaigned for Al Gore, John Kerry and all the liberal Democrats up and down the East Coast. He’s been taking pimp/gutter slang from the street from start of his career in Cleveland in the late ’60s.

Tim Russert, the life-long Democrat, used to be on the Imus show every week along with Biden, Kerry, Leiberman, Sharpton, the entire list of the Democrat “Rat Pack.”

All but one, Hillary Rodham Clinton. Imus called her “the devil,” a Chavez-style nickname. It was clear, Imus was not on the Hillary/Obmama band wagon.

Talk show host and political watchdog, Michael Savage has a theory. The Clintons made the “hit” to take out Imus.

The Democrat’s biggest junkyard dog gets away with it again and again. So who knew he would get fired right at the start of the ’08 campaign for the presidency?

The MSNBC morning talk show host of “Imus in the Morning,” who supported the Al Gore presidency, the John Kerry campaign and this year, “the good liberal” Senator Dodd’s chance at the White House went a little too far this time. He called the Rutgers University Womens’ basketball team several N-word-style names. Rutgers is an Ivy League school and the young women on that team made it all the way to the national championships.

Can you imgaine if Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh said anything close to the Imus racist remarks?

The bias and propaganda machine is becoming more transparent due in part to citizen journalists.

Look at the attacks on Mel Gibson when he made some negative remarks about Jews and their treatment of Palsitinians and constant war in the Middle East.

It’s sickening when you look at how long this double standard has been in effect.

What is worse, the Democrat machine and media alliance will turn the Imus flap to their advantage. Watch them get the “Fairness Doctrine” back.

Gatekeepers in robes like the Revs Sharpton and Jackson will be joined by Oboma and Hillary deciding what content you should be allowed to see and hear.

Get ready for a Brave New PC World.

Jimmy Carter a Disgraced President

by Mick Gregory

I just listened to Jimmy Carter on NPR this morning. The former Democrat president was trying to say that his statement on page 213 of his new hate and blame book, Peace Not Apartheid, was actually just an error.

“It is imperative that the general Arab community and all significant Palestinian groups make it clear that they will end the suicide bombings and other acts of terrorism when international laws and the ultimate goals of the Roadmap for Peace are accepted by Israel.”

(Carter is now saying there was a misplaced word, a mistake that will be fixed in future editions).

Which word is it?

Ladies and gentlemen, here is a test. Let’s see which word or words can change the meaning of Carter’s endorsement of murdering Jews?

…end terrorism when (replace with if)
…end terrorism when (when, if ever)
…end terrorism when (when pigs fly)

As a writer and editor, I can not find any way to read this sentence that does not clearly condone the murder of Jews on busses, in pizza parlors and in shops, until Israel follows former President Carter’s prescription for peace. This book caused 12 of Carter’s staff at his library (paid for by Arab foundations) to quit in disgust.

This is a major event. Imagine if you will, if Ronald Reagan or George Bush had written that?

It sheds light on the disgraced president — Carter is clearly on the side of terrorists and may have been his whole life. There are now stories coming out of Carter giving special leniency to a former Nazi SS soldier’s family in the U.S.

Carter supported the politics of Danny Ortega and Yasser Arafat.

Was that why Carter let the Islamic fascists take over Iran during his presidency?
Why did Jimmy Carter give the Panama Canal away?
What did the Camp David Accords accomplish?

These questions were not asked Carter:

What NPR didn’t ask Carter
Jimmy Carter was interviewed this morning on NPR. The interviewer pressed him on his use of the word ‘apartheid’, an obvious and reasonable question. However, there are a few other questions, also obvious and reasonable that were not asked. For example:

Do you think that you were influenced in any way by the millions of dollars you personally and the Carter Center received from Arab sources?
You said in your book that the Arabs must recognize Israel’s right to exist in peace. Don’t you think that it’s reasonable to expect an end to terrorism before Israeli concessions are made that compromise her security? Wouldn’t it be irresponsible for the Israeli government to give up territory while rockets are falling?
The thrust of your arguments is that Israel is responsible for the conflict as a result of her occupation of ‘Palestinian land’ in 1967. How do you account for the Palestinian terrorism against Israel (and the pre-state Jewish presence) since at least 1920? Don’t you think that the Arabs — both the Palestinians and Israel’s neighbor states — must bear some responsibility for the sustained terrorism and war that they’ve waged against the Jews over the years?
Update (1453 PST): Read Kenneth Stein’s review of Carter’s book. Stein was Executive Director of the Carter Center from 1983 to 1986, and the Center’s Middle East Fellow until 2006, when he resigned in protest of the book.
Visit: fresnozionism.org

Did the ‘advanced’ South American tribes bury women alive?

Mick Gregory

Have progressive liberals in the media and public schools buried the truth from the masses about atrocities such as killing and burying servants, wives and children of royalty in Egyptian and South American tombs? Are progressive leftists actually rewriting history?

What do you think?

Check your local newspaper for the slant when you see this story on Friday. Did the reporter explain that an ancient mortician didn’t create the look of terror on the mummy, that the twisted terror is due to the woman being buried alive?

Hands over her eyes and her face gripped with terror, the woman’s fear of death is all too obvious.
The remarkable mummy was found in a hidden burial vault in the Amazon.
It is at least 600 years old and has survived thanks to the embalming skills of her tribe, the Chachapoyas or “Cloud Warriors.”

amazonmumm1_228×390.jpg

It doesn’t take an expert to come to the conclusion that this female was buried alive.

Eleven more mummies were recovered from the massive cave complex 82 ft. below ground. Some appeared to be family members. Did they all die at once? Why speculate on that? (Because it may turn out to be the entire family was put to death as was practiced by Pharos.

This provides more evidence of the savage, cruel norms practiced by the often vaunted South American civilizations, as was depicted by Mel Gibson in his controversial movie “Apocalypto.”

The vault – which was also used for worship – was chanced upon three months ago by a farmer working at the edge of northern Peru’s rainforest. He tipped off scientists who uncovered ceramics, textiles and wall paintings.

I’d like to point out that a display at the “prestigious” Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago has done some rewrites of history in the permanent exhibit, “Inside Ancient Egypt”. There you can traverse the catacombs once used by Egyptian Kings and Queens and see the many mummies and tombs that have outlasted them. But also take note of how equal time is given to examine the labor-intensive lives of the servants and how they served their masters even in death. A model of a mummy embalming room (that I remember seeing as a student) has been updated. Instead of explaining how family and servants of the dead king were put to death to join him in the after life, the model’s description now ignores that bit of information, and explains away the set of several dead bodies as depicting a busy, highly-ranked embalming studio. Get it? The PC progressives didn’t want to cast a negative light on the godless, morbid practice. But just 25 or 30 years ago, the truth was being explained.

‘Apocalypto’ has prevented one of the biggest rewrites of evil in history

Mick Gregory

I just saw Apocalypto and I am in awe of Mel Gibson’s work. The digital photography caputured the jungle beauty and the heart pounding running that could not have been filmed just a few years ago. The cast was meticulously picked from villagers and the man who played Jaguar Paw is an excellent actor. He has a future in Hollywood.

But most important to me is that Gibson has pointed out that the Mayan empire was not morally or scientificly superior to Western Civilization. The Mayans did hold pagan festivals where they beheaded and cut the hearts out of captured countrymen and took women as sex slaves by the thousands. They were a blood lusting totalitarian society that killed off their own civilization at a greater clip than Hitler or Stalin. This movie is based on documented events and many are learning them for the first time.
Another was the Mayan’s great studies of the solar eclipse… For what reason, science? Only to show power over their people and stop the killings once every ten years or so. The Mayans had played a sport similar to lacross… No, it was just a sand pit where the sport was hunting men like animals.

Why the coverup?

Gibson has overturned one of the most unusual rewrites of an evil empire in history. I know that the progressive/socialists at our universities are not happy with the truth coming out. They are busy coming out with their counter punches.
“Don’t pay attention to Gibson, he’s a (fill in the blank). Why the distortions? Because it doesn’t fit their propaganda model that all culures are equal and most are even superior to Christianity, Western Civilization and the bottom line, America’s cultureal roots.

————

I remember teachers and texts telling me that the Mayans were so advanced, that they performed operations on skulls and hearts to save their warriors.

My father laughed at me when I repeated that story in the early 70s.

He said the Mayan witch doctors were killing people, mainly slaves, including virgins by cutting their hearts out and cooking them in front of them as offerings.

Living in San Francisco, I have to report that the Progressive Democrats in that city no longer observe Memorial Day, instead, the city has a parade celebrating Hispanic culture, compete with samba dancing, Mayan Sun God dances and floats.

I can imagine Hugo Chavez as one of the high priests ordering the heads chopped off of his competition.

Did you read this in your daily newspaper or text books?

Who is the media elite?

Former Newsday Publisher Robert Johnson (who headed the Times Mirror newspaper was sentenced last Friday to 15 months in federal prison and fined $50,000, following his plea to possession of child pornography and obstruction of justice.

Johnson, a top executive at Newsday from 1982 to 1994, also was ordered after imprisonment to serve 3 years of supervised release, undergo counseling for sex offenders, and have software installed on his future computers to monitor attempts to access child pornography.

Newsday is one of the liberal’s favorite East Coast papers, just after the New York Times, Washington Post and Boston Globe.

See the bias? What if Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage or any other conservative in the media were convicted of child pornograhphy? Whouldn’t that rate a page one story today?

Did your newspaper even mention this? How about CBS news? NPR? Dan Rather?

On another happier note for newspaper executives, McClatchy’s CEO is getting a big pay raise. After McClatchy bought Knight Ridder and chucked the problem newspapers to MediaNews group, and other’s shopping the fire sale, they have not seen a vote of confidence from investors. Does that stop the cozy board from rewarding their boss? No.

The McClatchy Co. chief executive officer Gary Pruitt will earn $1.1 million next year, a 4.8 percent increase from his salary this year, according to documents filed this week with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pruitt, the highest-paid chief executive of a publicly traded company in the Sacramento region, could earn another $1.38 million from an annual bonus if he reaches specific performance goals that have not been determined.

The Sacramento-based company bought Knight-Ridder this past summer, adding 20 newspapers — and selling off a dozen others, including the San Jose Mercury-News and the Philadelphia Inquirer.

The deal made McClatchy (NYSE: MNI) the nation’s second-largest newspaper chain. Its publications include The Sacramento Bee, Star Tribune of Minneapolis and the Miami Herald.

McClatchy’s compensation board also detailed the base salary and maximum bonuses for other senior executives this week. Vice presidents of operations Bob Weil and Frank Whittaker will each earn $600,000 next year, with a 60 percent of base salary as a maximum bonus — or $360,000 each. Vice president and chief financial officer Pat Talamantes’ salary is $500,000 with a 55 percent maximum bonus, while vice president of news Howard Weaver will earn $400,000 with a 50 percent of salary bonus target.